FRB Agent vs All Solana Snipers
BONKbot, Photon, BullX, Trojan, Maestro — they all promise the same thing. Here's the honest breakdown of where each one wins and where FRB Agent's local-execution model takes the lead.
| Bot | Type | Custody | Jito Bundles | Chains | Fee |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRB Agent | Local desktop | Non-custodial | Native + tip optimization | 7 chains incl. Solana | 20% on qualifying net profitable executions |
| BONKbot | Telegram Bot | Custodial (TG keys) | No private bundles | Solana only | ~1% per trade |
| Photon | Web Sniper | Browser wallet | Tip-priority only | Solana + EVM (limited) | ~0.5% per trade |
| BullX | Web Sniper | Browser wallet | Tip-priority only | Solana focus | ~1% per trade |
| Trojan | Telegram Bot | Custodial (TG keys) | Limited | Solana only | ~0.9% per trade |
| Maestro | Telegram Bot | Custodial (TG keys) | No | Multi-chain (TG) | ~1% per trade |
BONKbot
Telegram BotConvenient for tiny amounts; risky above $1K.
Photon
Web SniperStrong UX; weak on bundle-level control and audit trail.
BullX
Web SniperSimilar to Photon; better filters but still no Jito control.
Trojan
Telegram BotTelegram-style risks; closed source.
Maestro
Telegram BotMulti-chain, but custodial across all of them.
FRB Agent
Local DesktopMulti-chain non-custodial agent with native Jito bundle controls, SHA-256-verified builds, and simulation-first workflows.
Run Solana sniping locally — keys stay yours
Free download, Jito-native workflows, and a 20% fee on qualifying net profitable executions.