Comparison
Why FRB replaces Telegram scripts
Telegram-distributed “MEV bots” often hide their relay endpoints, request private keys, or keep custody of your funds. FRB ships as a signed Windows agent with documented telemetry and governance.
What Telegram scripts miss
Most Telegram offers are opaque. You rarely know who wrote the code, whether it is patched, or how it handles your keys. Many demand deposits into custodial wallets. Some proxy your transactions through remote servers. When something goes wrong, there is no changelog or ticketing system—just a silent admin channel.
FRB’s approach to trust
FRB publishes signed installers, SHA-256 hashes on /releases, refund policy, SLA, and security disclosure docs right on the marketing site. Funds stay in your wallet, node pairing makes hardware accountable, and telemetry gives you forensic evidence if a trade misfires. That’s the baseline you need to pass internal audits.
Key evaluation questions
- Can you independently verify the build? FRB: yes. Telegram scripts: almost never.
- Where is support handled? FRB: dedicated portal. Telegram: DMs.
- What happens during a refund or exploit? FRB: documented policy. Telegram: unclear.
- How many relays/networks are supported? FRB: multi-chain. Telegram: usually single.
If you answered “no” to any of the above for your current script, pivot now. The amount of capital you save by skipping one exploit is worth more than any “free” Telegram tool.
Warning signs to look for
- Admin only accepts payments via one-off wallet addresses.
- Script requires you to share seed phrases or private keys.
- No documentation outside a Telegram pin; no mention of refunds or support.
- Relay endpoints are hidden, so you cannot evaluate inclusion or latency.
If three or more signs apply, treat the offer as hostile. Use FRB or other verifiable software instead.
| Capability | FRB Agent | Telegram scripts |
|---|---|---|
| Source & signing | Authenticode-signed EXE + SHA-256 on Releases | Unofficial script links, no signing |
| Relay support | Flashbots, Polygon, BNB, Base, with auto-rotation | Single relay or public mempool only |
| Node pairing | PIN pairing, node labels, uptime tracking | Manual config, often single-session |
| Risk guard rails | Budget caps, withdraw locks, refund policy | No policy; funds custodial with script owner |
| Compliance assets | Refund, Risk disclosure, Telemetry docs | None |
Security posture
- Signed executable with SHA-256 posted publicly.
- No Telegram custody: funds stay in your wallet.
- Node pairing ensures you know exactly which hardware is live.
Operational readiness
- Telemetry & refund policies documented for procurement.
- Support/SLA page plus vulnerability disclosure process.
- Knowledge Base + video FAQ for onboarding teams.
Ready to switch?
Download the FRB agent, verify the signature, and pair your first node client.
Download FRBNeed KPIs for management?
Use the benchmarks pages (/metrics) to cite inclusion/latency in your memo.
View benchmarksFAQ
Can we harden a Telegram script ourselves? Maybe, but you’ll still need to sign builds, archive versions, and document policies. FRB already does that work, so most desks would rather spend time on strategies instead of plumbing.
What about self-hosted APIs? APIs are fine if you have engineering resources. Just make sure you meet the same standards (signing, telemetry, refunds) that FRB offers. You can still feed FRB data into your pipeline later.
How do we convince stakeholders to migrate? Share this comparison, link to security andtelemetry pages, and highlight the refund policy. Most compliance teams approve within a week once they see the paperwork.